September 3, 2026

6 minute read

Why Data Center DAS Belongs in the Day One Design

Reliable cellular coverage should be treated as critical data center infrastructure from Day One. Amit Shetye explains why planning DAS early can reduce costly retrofit challenges while supporting daily operations, security and emergency response.

data center professionalsBy the time someone realizes they cannot make a phone call inside a new data center, the cheapest fix is already gone. It is one of the most common issues we see.

Whenever we walk through a new data center design review, we spend countless hours discussing power redundancy, cooling, fiber pathways, security, and fire protection. Every one of these systems is treated as critical infrastructure from Day One.

Then there is cellular connectivity.

More often than not, it does not come up until the building is already operational. Suddenly the question becomes, "How do we add DAS?" instead of "Why was it not included from the beginning?"

As someone who has spent the last several years designing, commissioning, and troubleshooting DAS systems inside hyperscale data centers across the country, I have seen this happen far too many times.

The reality is simple. If reliable cellular connectivity is important on Day One, then DAS needs to be part of the Day One design.

Why does a data center need cellular coverage?

It is a fair question. People often picture data centers as lights out facilities filled with servers. While automation continues to grow, these buildings are anything but empty. They are full of technicians, contractors, security personnel, commissioning teams, and operations staff who rely on cellular connectivity every single day.

Whether it is approving a multi factor authentication prompt, communicating during maintenance activities, coordinating construction teams, receiving emergency notifications, or simply making a phone call, cellular service has become part of normal operations.

On top of that, many jurisdictions now require public safety radio coverage inside buildings, often as an emergency responder radio communication system, or ERRCS. RF planning is becoming just as important as electrical or mechanical planning.

The challenge is that data centers seem almost designed to block RF signals.

Concrete walls, metal roofs, dense equipment racks, shielded rooms, and long corridors all work against the signal coming from the outdoor network, and the result is dead zones in the places people actually work. You can have a cell tower sitting a mile away and still have little to no usable signal once you are inside.

That is exactly what Distributed Antenna Systems were built to solve.

Why retrofitting a DAS costs more

The biggest issue is not that DAS gets installed.

The issue is when it gets installed.

When it is treated as an afterthought, everything becomes more complicated.

Cable routes have already been finalized. Equipment rooms are already full. Pathways that would have taken minutes to install during construction now require expensive rework. Every cable has to find its way around infrastructure that was never designed with RF in mind.

We see this play out over and over. I ran into it myself on a hyperscale data center project in Georgia.

The DAS design came after the building had already been laid out. As a result, the patch panel serving the access points ended up being located five racks away from the transport node it needed to connect to. That pushed the structured cabling beyond the 100 meter Ethernet limitation.

What should have been a straightforward connection became a design problem that required additional coordination and rework.

The frustrating part?

It was completely avoidable.

Had the DAS team been involved during the initial design phase, both racks would have been planned together and the issue would never have existed.

It is a perfect example of how a relatively small design decision early in the project can create unnecessary challenges later.

Where does the operator equipment go?

That problem in Georgia was really a distance problem. On a campus you run into the same thing, just at a much bigger scale.

Most data center campuses are not one building. They start with one or two and keep growing for years. All of them need coverage, and they need it from every operator, not just whichever one signed first. The technician out at the generator yard is on whatever network he is on. The vendor you escorted through the door an hour ago is on a different one. In a colocation facility you also have tenants and their contractors coming and going all day. One system carrying every operator is what people mean by a neutral host, and on a campus it is the only thing that works.

So where does the operator equipment actually sit? I do not see that question asked early enough.

There are a few ways to do it. The equipment can go in the building it serves. It can sit in one spot on the campus and feed the other buildings from there. Or it can sit somewhere else entirely and serve several sites at once, with fiber covering the distance. That last one is what the industry calls centralized RAN.

None of those is wrong. They just have different consequences for how much floor space you give up in each building, how much fiber you pull, and how easily you add building four when the time comes.

What I would push for is that somebody actually makes the call. When no one does, the first building sets the pattern by accident and every building after it inherits that decision. In-building wireless is one of those systems where you decide once and live with it for years. Much easier to sort out while the rooms are still lines on a drawing.

How to design a DAS into a data center

Treating DAS like critical infrastructure does not mean adding another complicated system.

It simply means giving it the same attention that every other building system already receives.

That includes:

  • Defining indoor cellular coverage requirements during the initial design phase instead of after commissioning.
  • Coordinating equipment room locations, cable pathways, and antenna placement alongside the electrical and mechanical teams.
  • Designing for the actual RF environment, taking into account dense racks, concrete construction, shielded spaces, and both commercial operator and public safety requirements.
  • Accounting for headend space, power, and cooling, because in a data center every square foot and every kilowatt is already committed to something else.
  • Leaving room for future expansion because data centers rarely remain the same size or capacity for very long.

Of everything on that list, headend space is the one that surprises people the most. It is worth asking any DAS vendor what their headend is going to cost you in space, power, and cooling before the equipment rooms get drawn.

None of this is difficult when it is planned early.

It becomes difficult when it is not.

Why DAS is no longer optional

The data center industry is building at an incredible pace. Schedules are tighter than ever, labor is limited, and owners want facilities online as quickly as possible.

Adding an entirely separate DAS project after occupancy creates unnecessary cost, schedule impacts, and coordination headaches. More importantly, it creates operational challenges that could have been avoided with better planning. Reliable indoor cellular connectivity is not a luxury feature anymore. It is part of how modern facilities operate.

Just like power, cooling, fiber, and fire protection, it deserves a seat at the table during design, not after the building is already standing. The best DAS projects I have worked on were not necessarily the most advanced. They were simply the ones where someone asked the right question early.

"How are people going to stay connected once this building is operational?"

If that question gets answered during design instead of after occupancy, everyone wins.

More on what this looks like inside a data center: our data centers page.

Author